<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Jason Meininger</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scalefigure.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scalefigure.com</link>
	<description>on the fringe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:17:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Double Falsehood &#8211; Shakespeare&#8217;s &#8216;Lost&#8217; Play by Tweets that mention Double Falsehood – Shakespeare’s ‘Lost’ Play &#124; Jason Meininger -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://scalefigure.com/2010/12/double-falsehood-shakespeares-lost-play/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Double Falsehood – Shakespeare’s ‘Lost’ Play &#124; Jason Meininger -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalefigure.com/?p=156#comment-33</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jason Meininger, Bathtubgin. Bathtubgin said: Also: anyone else want to come see Double Falsehood with me? @shadowdaddy is lighting it! http://tinyurl.com/dblflshd [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jason Meininger, Bathtubgin. Bathtubgin said: Also: anyone else want to come see Double Falsehood with me? @shadowdaddy is lighting it! <a href="http://tinyurl.com/dblflshd" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/dblflshd</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guardian critic criticizes critics by Chantal</title>
		<link>http://scalefigure.com/2010/09/guardian-critic-criticizes-critics/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Chantal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scalefigure.com/?p=87#comment-5</guid>
		<description>&quot;if someone has given a show a good review, a producer is going to use it in promo material.&quot;

That&#039;s not necessarily true - even if a review is negative, the least negative parts of it will be used anyway!

Also, thinking about a show which you recently saw and which I skipped, one of the reviews was very glowing but so badly-written it could have reflected badly on the companies to have quoted from it. 

But it would be interesting to see the outcome of a plan on how to &quot;accredit&quot; reviewers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;if someone has given a show a good review, a producer is going to use it in promo material.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not necessarily true &#8211; even if a review is negative, the least negative parts of it will be used anyway!</p>
<p>Also, thinking about a show which you recently saw and which I skipped, one of the reviews was very glowing but so badly-written it could have reflected badly on the companies to have quoted from it. </p>
<p>But it would be interesting to see the outcome of a plan on how to &#8220;accredit&#8221; reviewers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

